Building / Rebuilding an M44b19

IainP

Zorg Guru (III)
British Zeds
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Points
125
Location
Out of my Tree, North of Perth, Scotland
Model of Z
1.9
To be clear, I’m not a mechanic/vehicle technician/engine builder, I’m a dental technician to trade. I’ve built more than a few engines, mostly Suzuki, and watched, usually in horror as people have destroyed perfectly functional engines by “rebuilding” them.

First off, BMW engines aren’t made very well. The cranks, rods and pistons are very poorly balanced, more on that later.

Second, why do you want to rebuild it? It’s utterly pointless replacing everything if it doesn’t need it. Check your oil pressure, that can tell you if the big ends ‘May’ need replacing, though it may be the pump or the relief valve. Check your compression, and do it properly, with and without oil. Do a vacuum test, that gives you more info on rings and valves. See google and YouTube, or I’ll be writing for days. It’s all Information you do BEFORE stripping the engine. Mileage can be irrelevant if the oil has been changed regularly. I built several Swift GTi engines with over 100K where I didn’t need to touch the short motor other than balancing, all the spec’s were in tolerance for a new engine.

Use an engineering company you TRUST, you may be spending a great deal of money with them. I only use West of Scotland Engineering in Glasgow, www.wose.co.uk, have done for nearly 40 years, tried a couple others more local to where I lived, learned expensive lessons. Happy to make the 120 mile round trip.

Have a Plan. Do know what you want to do. Keep It Simple Stupid. KISS
Perfect Planning Prevents Poor Performance. 5P
It’s all the same, don’t just blunder ahead, that burns money, and blows engines.
Which brings us to the most important thing; THE INTERNET IS FULL OF BULLSHIT PASSED OFF AS ‘GOSPEL’.
Z3 ‘gospel’ examples, the steel frame seat will protect you in a rollover, 4 cyl engines don’t like a lightened flywheel, both hilarious nonsense.
That takes you back up to, do know what you want to do. There are various piston, crank and rod combo’s for these engines, lots of the information is spread from people who haven’t actually combined some of these and is wrong/incomplete.
BMW cranks aren’t perfectly balanced, the rods can vary up to 3g, the pistons the same. Doesn’t sound much but it produces vibration. 6 cyl owners smugly thinking “just fit a 6cyl”, yours aren’t built any better, you just have six events per rotation and an even heavier flywheel combo to damp them.
To give you an idea I could balance a 50p coin on a Suzuki rocker cover (2g spread over both rod/pistons instead of 6g). It would fall over about 15-1600 rpm, balanced to 0.00g it fell over 5-5500rpm. You can’t balance clutch discs and gearbox internals, well, you can, but that’s into stupidly serious levels of spending.

I have a 76,000 engine I’m wanting more power from.
I’m not going into stripping it down, covered in manuals, do buy one, if only for the torque schedule. Be very aware, there’s a bolt at the top of the rear timing case that’s in a dirt trap. Find and remove it. Otherwise the 2 part timing case turns into a three part case when you try to shock it loose with a plastic hammer as I did.
Measure the end float of the crank, the thrust washers are incorporated into the center main shells, not the greatest design.
Buy yourself a pack of red plastigauge. www.plastigauge.co.uk Read the Bloody Instructions!!
Wear clean gloves, remove each main bearing one by one, check for scoring, use plastigauge to measure each clearance and write them down. Make sure everything is clean, oil the journals and reassemble. Do the same with the big ends, though at this stage I remove each rod/pistons combo after measuring. Mark both so you can reassemble correctly.

If the journals aren’t scored, the shells don’t have any untoward marks (see google images), and the bearing clearances are in spec, you’ve won a watch, no regrinding needed. Happens more often that not if the oil has been changed regularly.
IMG_7041.jpeg
In the image above you can quite clearly see which were the big end bottom shells, they have the slight scuff. You really don’t want to see much more than that. You definitely do not want to see the mark extend completely across, or continue up the side of the shell.
Top one you can see a line, you would check there isn’t damage to the journal, there wasn’t in this case. If reusing the rods and shells, store them carefully, it’s easy to score a shell, see second bottom, I did that to show what can happen.

I’m using a lightweight flywheel for a 6 cylinder, bought from the States. Takes a 240mm M3 clutch cover, which is the same as a 7 series and much cheaper, I’ll add the number. Had it a while, if I were doing it now I’d buy one of the spring center Z4 multiplate flywheel combo’s from eBay, only solid ones were available when I bought the flywheel.
The crank, damper (front pulley), flywheel and clutch cover were all balanced at West, I confess I forgot to ask Ross, who did the balancing, to note how far out it was. The crank needed balancing slightly, the front damper adjusted, the flywheel was out slightly in relation to the crank. As expected, being for a six, but the cover needed no adjustment. Though it was all marked so it could be reassembled as balanced.

It’s a good idea to pop to Metric Mechanic for a read of their 4cyl builds
 
Last edited:

IainP

Zorg Guru (III)
British Zeds
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Points
125
Location
Out of my Tree, North of Perth, Scotland
Model of Z
1.9
The pistons in this engine, with rings and pins varied from 453g to 456.5g, the rods with shells from 555.47 to 559.00g . Whether by intention or luck that came down to 2.5g across the combo, average 1012g. You can say, well that’s bigger all, it won’t make a difference. It does. I’m not going into the formulae, simplistically it results in four slightly different power strokes per rotation of the engine. Vibration. The more you can even out the power strokes, actually all the strokes since there are three others happening at the same time, the smoother the engine feels. You then don’t need a massive vibration damper flywheel, a light single mass flywheel suffices. Suddenly, without doing anything else, your engine can accelerate faster.

The Fun part what can you change!
The only oversize pistons I can find fits the standard rods are 0.5mm oversize and they’re stupid expensive.
After spending far too many hours on Google, people have successfully fitted
S50 and S54 from BMW and C20XE/LET from Vauxhall/Opel. There are suggestions of others, but I can find any thread that’s definitive. To be completely clear I can’t actually find a thread where anyone details everything they’ve had to do.

N.B. ALL of those pistons use 21mm gudgeon pins (wrist pins). Standard is 22mm.
IMG_7042.jpeg
The capacity of the M44 is 1895cc, with the S50 piston above it becomes 1958cc, and the S54 1986cc. BE AWARE! The standard gasket is only designed to accommodate a 0.5mm overbore. You need an oversize gasket, from Cometic for instance, budget £150ish.
The weights of the above all include rings, circlips and pins. Actually I’ve just spotted they don’t, the S50 piston doesn’t have rings fitted, be about another 26g, I’ll correct that later.
The compression height of the standard piston, distance from the center of the pin to the top of the piston is 30.4mm. Compression height of the other 2 is 32mm, so 1.5mm needs milled off. The piston pockets are deeper, so whichever I use will involve a little bit of calculation. Both those pistons are Mahle, I’ll likely go with whichever i find is lightest after milling. I have 6 S50, only 5 S54 and they came from a blown engine so a couple have marks.

I have very little info on the C20 pistons as I quickly acquired the S pistons cheaply. They can be got in various forms, cast or forged, and in at least two different compression heights.

Rods.
I had originally intended a remote mounted turbo installation when I found I couldn’t fit an Eaton where an air con compressor would go. Hence the Maxspeeding rod. My heart problems put me off that, I wasn’t at all sure I could get my competition licence renewed. Anyway, the Max Rods are Very well made, 0.11g spread, but 25g heavier than a standard rod. MM use a rod below 500g for a n/a low mass configuration. The ZRP rod is advertised as 492, or 506g. It’s not, it’s 550g, not within the advertised +/-1g either.
IMG_7045.jpeg
I’m fairly confident I can get the maxspeeding rod below 525g. Those rods are going to West this week to be rebushed.
Currently investigating lighter gudgeon pins.

Crankshafts.
Now, if you’ve taken the time to read the MM pdf you’ll know there are two diesel cranks that can be used to increase the stroke. I’m not going down that route, a quick eBay didn’t turn up the long nose version for anything like sensible money and I have enough to do milling pistons. Potential capacity is 2160cc (I think) depending on how brave you are with the bore.
 
Last edited:

IainP

Zorg Guru (III)
British Zeds
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Points
125
Location
Out of my Tree, North of Perth, Scotland
Model of Z
1.9
I don’t have the head from this engine apart, it’s still in a box somewhere, so I’ll use some pics that may not be M44.
Metric Mechanic say they can only get a 6 % increase in flow, so the head is pretty decent. I don’t recommend you attempt your own port work, it’s a bit of a John Wick thing, it takes focus and commitment, once you start you have to see it through.
The ports don’t have any undercuts at the seats or lumps and bumps in the ports. I have some port forms, which I can’t find at the moment, if they don’t turn up I’ll make some more and show you.
With today’s fuels full of detergents engines don’t carbon up to the extent they used to. Maybe it’s Scotlands damper climate but valves and seats, particularly in seldom used engines seem to suffer more pitting. That can play hell with emissions, if you’re really struggling to get a 4cyl through, even with the o/e cat, it may just need the valves relapped.
This is the original head I blew the gasket on when the thermostat seized.
DSC_0329.jpeg
You can see how dirty the valve seats are, 116K but the bores were perfect.
There’s also a technique called ‘polyquad’, I first heard of it at a David Vizard lecture, tried it, and it works. Google it, you’ll find it much derided by some people, I’ve only personally used a version of it on about four or five heads but I’ve gotten good results. It involves biasing the flow, instead of porting both ports equally, you treat opposite ports, eg 1 and 3, or 2 and 4. Supposed to sink the valves as well. I’ve used a version of that by back cutting one inlet and one exhaust valve. It’s pretty much the same as increasing the lift on one valve. It increases the mixing in the chamber for a better burn.
Again, I wouldn’t recommend you try it if you’re a beginner to head modifying.

IMG_6879.jpeg
The outlined area above is essentially dead, it’s getting in the way of flow until the valve is some way off the seat. Removing it is the equivalent of higher lift, or a longer duration cam, without actually altering the cam.

If your Z can’t get through emissions, have run a compression and vacuum test which suggests it’s poorly seating valves then relapping is a tedious but easily diy job.
IMG_6881.jpeg
Yes that’s an A series Mini head but the procedure is the same. With hard valves and seats in the bimmer you only need fine paste and the stick, about 5 mins per valve.
I will post up the whole procedure start to finish when I get round to it. If I can I’ll do the strip down this week.
If you want to, you can go as mad as this with the valves, they don’t stay shiny for long, but the smooth surface reduces heat transfer.

IMG_20190324_184529_967.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Top